Stellar Half-mass Radii of 0.5 z < 2.3 Galaxies: Comparison with JWST/NIRCam Half-light Radii
Bell, Eric F.; Franx, Marijn; Muzzin, Adam; van der Wel, Arjen; Kriek, Mariska; Marchesini, Danilo; de Graaff, Anna; Leja, Joel; Nelson, Erica J.; Brammer, Gabriel B.; van de Ven, Glenn; Häußler, Boris; Miller, Tim B.; Martorano, Marco; Nedkova, Kalina V.; Bezanson, Rachel S.
Belgium, Chile, United States, Denmark, Austria, Canada, Germany, Netherlands
Abstract
We use CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging to measure rest-frame near-IR light profiles of 435 M ⋆ > 1010 M ⊙ galaxies in the redshift range of 0.5 < z < 2.3. We compare the resulting rest-frame 1.5-2 μm half-light radii (R NIR) with stellar half-mass radii ( ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ ) derived with multicolor light profiles from CANDELS Hubble Space Telescope imaging. In general agreement with previous work, we find that R NIR and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ are up to 40% smaller than the rest-frame optical half-light radius R opt. The agreement between R NIR and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ is excellent, with a negligible systematic offset (<0.03 dex) up to z = 2 for quiescent galaxies and up to z = 1.5 for star-forming galaxies. We also deproject the profiles to estimate ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star },3{\rm{D}}}$ , the radius of a sphere containing 50% of the stellar mass. We present the R-M ⋆ distribution of galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.5, comparing R opt, ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ , and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star },3{\rm{D}}}$ . The slope is significantly flatter for ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star },3{\rm{D}}}$ compared to R opt, mostly due to downward shifts in size for massive star-forming galaxies, while ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star },3{\rm{D}}}$ do not show markedly different trends. Finally, we show rapid evolution of the size (R ∝ (1 + z)-1.7±0.1) of massive (M ⋆ > 1011 M ⊙) quiescent galaxies between z = 0.5 and z = 2.3, again comparing R opt, ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star }}$ , and ${R}_{{{M}}_{\star },3{\rm{D}}}$ . We conclude that the main tenets of the evolution of the size narrative established over the past 20 yr, based on rest-frame optical light profile analysis, still hold in the era of JWST/NIRCam observations in the rest-frame near-IR.