X-Ray, UV, and Optical Observations of Supernova 2006bp with Swift: Detection of Early X-Ray Emission
Campana, S.; Pian, E.; Greiner, J.; Chevalier, R. A.; Brown, P. J.; Gehrels, N.; Pooley, D.; Burrows, D. N.; Koss, M.; Holland, S. T.; Mazzali, P. A.; Nomoto, K.; Soderberg, A. M.; Nousek, J. A.; Landsman, W.; Immler, S.; Dessart, L.; Milne, P.; Petre, R.; Roming, P. W. A.; Weiler, K. W.; Stockdale, C. J.; Williams, C. L.; Kelley, M. T.
United States, Italy, Germany, Japan
Abstract
We present results on the X-ray and optical/UV emission from the Type II-P supernova (SN) 2006bp and the interaction of the SN shock with its environment, obtained with the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board Swift. SN 2006bp is detected in X-rays at a 4.5 σ level of significance in the merged XRT data from days 1 to 12 after the explosion. If the 0.2-10 keV band X-ray luminosity of L0.2-10=(1.8+/-0.4)×1039 ergs s-1 is caused by interaction of the SN shock with circumstellar material (CSM) deposited by a stellar wind from the progenitor's companion star, a mass-loss rate of M˙~(1×10-5 Msolar yr-1)(vw/10 km s-1) is inferred. The mass-loss rate is consistent with the nondetection in the radio with the VLA on days 2, 9, and 11 after the explosion and is characteristic of a red supergiant progenitor with a mass of ~12-15 Msolar prior to the explosion. The Swift data further show a fading of the X-ray emission starting around day 12 after the explosion. In combination with a follow-up XMM-Newton observation obtained on day 21 after the explosion, an X-ray rate of decline of LX~t-n with index n=1.2+/-0.6 is inferred. Since no other SN has been detected in X-rays prior to the optical peak, and since Type II-P SNe have an extended ``plateau'' phase in the optical, we discuss the scenario that the X-rays might be due to inverse Compton scattering of photospheric optical photons off relativistic electrons produced in circumstellar shocks. However, due to the high required value of the Lorentz factor (~10-100), which is inconsistent with the ejecta velocity inferred from optical line widths, we conclude that inverse Compton scattering is an unlikely explanation for the observed X-ray emission.